Skip to content

SAMPLE — illustrative report format. Not a verified audit of a real uploaded font file.

Sample report

Aperture Sans Regular

aperture-sans-regular.woff2 · WOFF2 · Typography Standard 2.0 · 7/16/2026, 3:52:34 AM

Meets TS 2.0 with warnings92/ 100

OK

28

Warnings

2

Recommended below threshold

2

Non-blocking recommended checks

Mandatory failures

0

Summary

No mandatory TS 2.0 gates failed. Two non-blocking findings should be reviewed before deployment.

Category scores

Legibility

92 / 100

9 OK · 1 warning · 0 recommended below threshold

  • Machine recognition at 12px above threshold

Character Support

94 / 100

4 OK · 1 warning · 0 recommended below threshold

  • Basic Latin complete

Technical Quality

100 / 100

6 OK · 0 warnings · 0 recommended below threshold

  • WOFF2 present

Production Readiness

90 / 100

5 OK · 0 warnings · 2 recommended below threshold

  • Web embedding declared

Deployment considerations

Deployment considerations derived from measured TS 2.0 results. Not approval for a specific use case.

Deployment considerations from Typography Standard gates
ContextFindingNotes
Large display / campaign headlinesReview non-blocking findingsTS 2.0 does not approve creative use. Large sizes may reduce some small-size legibility risks measured in this report.
Body text / editorialReview non-blocking findingsConfirm reading size, line length, and spacing in the finished layout (WCAG implementation).
Product UI / dense interfacesReview non-blocking findingsSmall UI sizes are where ambiguity and recognition findings matter most. Review evidence before deployment.
Web embeddingReview non-blocking findingsConfirm payload size, embedding permissions, and license metadata before deployment.
Multilingual / locale rolloutInsufficient dataCharacter coverage is measured for published Latin-oriented sets. Validate target locales separately.

Requirements

RequirementCategoryStatusResultThresholdSeverityEvidence
TS2-READ-004
Recognition at 12px
legibilityOK84%80%recommended
TS2-AMB-001
i/l/1 Distinction
legibilityOK82%75%mandatory
TS2-AMB-003
rn/m Distinction
legibilityWarning68%70%recommended
TS2-COV-001
Basic Latin Coverage
character_supportOK100%95%mandatory
TS2-DEP-002
File Size Efficiency
production_readinessFail520KB500KBrecommended

Evidence

Overall score
Method
Weighted pillar average across Typography Standard requirements.
Result
92 / 100
Decision relevance
Single 0–100 score for comparing files and tracking retests.
Mandatory gates
Method
Critical requirements must pass or certification is blocked.
Result
0 mandatory failure(s)
Decision relevance
Prevents high average scores from masking blocking defects.
File integrity
Method
SHA-256 hash of the analyzed font bytes.
Result
demo-hash
Decision relevance
Binds the report to the exact tested file without storing the font.
Format and family
Method
Parsed from upload metadata and font tables.
Result
Aperture Sans Regular · WOFF2 · 612 glyphs
Decision relevance
Confirms the tested asset identity for handoff and verification.

Requirement evidence (warnings and failures)

  • TS2-AMB-003

    rn/m Distinction

    rn/m separation is below the recommended threshold at small sizes.

    Measured: 68% · Threshold: 70%

  • TS2-DEP-002

    File Size Efficiency

    WOFF2 payload exceeds the recommended efficiency threshold.

    Measured: 520KB · Threshold: 500KB

Technical metadata
Family name
Aperture Sans
Format
WOFF2
Standard version
2.0

Family map

Aperture Sans Regular · styles detected from this upload. Upload a ZIP of family files to expand the weight map.

  • ThinNot in this file
  • Extra LightNot in this file
  • LightNot in this file
  • RegularPresent
  • MediumNot in this file
  • SemiboldNot in this file
  • BoldNot in this file
  • Extra BoldNot in this file
  • BlackNot in this file

Detected: Regular · Compare family members on Compare.

Remediation priorities

  • · Review rn/m separation before dense UI text below 12px.
  • · Reduce WOFF2 payload below 500KB for production web delivery.

Certification

File hash: demo-hash · Preview until published

Scores reflect measured file, rendering, and metadata evidence — not editorial judgment. Mandatory failures block certification even when the overall score is high. Font file bytes are deleted after analysis; the report retains measured results and a cryptographic file hash.